Saturday, 31 July 2010

Why “The Empyrean Age” sucks

'Empyrean' by olive green annaYeah, I know I’ve arrived really, really late to this party. But I just finished reading The Empyrean Age by Tony Gonzales and I need to let you know, if you didn’t already, that it SUCKS.

You may rightly ask yourself, “why would Casiella, a known lover of EVE fiction, say such a thing?” I wanted to like this book. I wanted to read it and say to everyone who has griped previously that they just didn’t understand, that Tony Gonzales actually worked subtle magic.

But then I read the book, and I knew that in fact this novel consists of (almost) nothing but classically bad writing. Leaving aside for a moment the thematic element (Jamyl’s telepathy) that simply doesn’t belong in the cyberpunk post-humanist world of EVE, the writing itself struck me as about on the level of a university freshman creative writing class. Evidently, he never met a breathless superlative he didn’t like, nor a plot hole he cared to cover. He repeated other elements constantly, to the point where  Rettic suggested a drinking game for every time someone “banged their fist on the table in anger”. And perhaps he could have found other ways to describe volumetric displays besides endlessly referring to, erm, volumetric displays.

Many of the sex scenes (and this book has quite a few) seem thrown into the plot purely for titillation rather than to serve any atmospheric purpose, much less advance the storyline. The rape scene in particular could have held tremendous symbolism, but the ham-handed writing instead turned it into something that creates a different sort of meta-disgust in the reader. Come to think of it, you could say that about almost anything you care to note in the book.

The book did have a few bits that made it worth the few dollars I spent on it, all related to background info. We get a better view of capsuleer-related technology, for example, and the inner workings of the Caldari and Minmatar governments.

But these few bits don’t even begin to compensate for the pain this book caused me, not in wonderment at the cold, harsh universe of the game world, but the cold, harsh universe that tricked me into reading this book.

I still trust The Burning Life, the EVE novel by Hjalti “CCP Abraxas” Danielsson coming out in a few weeks, will rebuild my trust in what the CCP storyline team can accomplish.

Related posts:

  1. Worldbuilding in EVE Online
  2. OOC: Which posts do you enjoy the most?
  3. New EVE Chronicle: “Prosopagnosia”

  • It is a critique, Mule. I'm personally just being honest. Also, something that costs $20 or more vs something that is free is going to be held to a more discerning standard. From my personal perspective, EA did not deliver.
  • Nikilaiki Ruutarhara
    There is a lot I can say about this novel. I will, however, leave all of you a fun mission; look up the criticisms Damon Knight had of A. E. Van Vogt's "World of Null-A". Those are the same criticisms I have of this novel. I may even have the energy to write a full critique of Empyrean Age when I have the energy to finish the book. ;)

    To paraphrase Damon Knight, "Tony Gonzalez is not a giant as often maintained. He's only a pygmy using a giant typewriter."

    That said, Heth is one of my favorite characters of all time. This character, despite the "EPIC!" Mary Sue chain of events, is rather likable (by me at least). The Broker breaks my "Gosseyn Paradox" figuratively, literally and multiordinally. ;)

    The telepathy thing... all I can say is it's easily explainable (within the context of Gonzalez's previous works). I figured it out yesterday and it blew my mind. >.<
  • "One thing I have noticed is that sci-fi tends to be (though isn't always) of a higher quality than other genres. that might possibly be preference rather than any difference in the technical quality of the writing."

    I believe good romance tends to do an overall better job with character development ("good" = "stories that involve people who make credible choices based on credible information, setting and circumstances" and "credible" = "the cable repair guy is wearing pants and will wait outside the apartment for the heroine to get dressed from the shower he interrupted rather than insisting she finish up while he's working (cue Chapter Two boom-chicka-wow-wow)").

    When a science fiction or a fantasy author devotes some attention to the people roaming around inside their Big New Strange Ideas and Beautiful Weird Shit, it makes me a happy girl.
  • Stitcher
    "it strikes me that if liking well-written stuff makes us "mis-calibrated for quality", then maybe the calipers shold get re-adjusted. ;)"

    made me lol there. It's a fair point.

    One thing I have noticed is that sci-fi tends to be (though isn't always) of a higher quality than other genres. that might possibly be preference rather than any difference in the technical quality of the writing... but I'll read damn near anything, and I've got to say, it's amazing how many very sucksessful (spelling intentional) authors are guilty of the exact same sins you're accurately ascribing to TonyG.

    I chatted with him at Fanfest 2008 about this stuff actually, and he hinted that Jamyl Sarum's "telepathy" does have a valid in-setting "scientific" explanation. I think his attitude was that an incongruity is just something that hasn't been explained yet, and that he wanted to leave a few things open for his next stab at a novel by not explaining them - unfortunately, what were supposed to be mysteries and hooks to draw readers in to the second novel instead look like plot holes because, to be frank, he's not good enough an author to pull that trick off.

    Still, with all this feedback about the place we can hope he'll take it all to heart and the result will be an improvement in the quality of his writing.
  • wwwvenomsbitecom
    "I don't "hate" him for "destroying" a universe I love" (I might be reading this wrong but you say you don't hate him for destroying a universe you love but you also add the clause he did it a disservice. Sorry for the confusion, what do you mean?)

    I find this interesting and more to the points I was making about how wrapped up we get in this game. Can I ask how he destroyed the universe of EVE? I have to also say I never read his book from the perspective of an EVE player, more from the perspective of one who likes the SciFi genre and it was sure cool to see places mentioned that I've been to in game.

    I think the bias you state in having your EVE universe destroyed is enough to say we might indeed be mis-calibrated in how we view fiction centered around EVE. I think Stitcher has a valid point and it's not relating to spotting quality fiction at all.
  • wwwvenomsbitecom
    Well, first off, yes you misunderstood my comments and I'm very must still interested in your responses since you took the time to write about the issues and elude to them in your post. But I certainly understand if it launches you into more work than you have time for. A critique of writing isn't a quick thing. You were just so strong in how you felt about his writings shortcomings I figured that you might have it more critiqued and would then be able to engage in the idea. No problem if not. It sucked and you didn't like it, that will do. :)

    I think Stitcher might be on to something here, most EVE players as fiction readers might be a bit jaded. Maybe holding fiction about the game to a very high standard, for several reasons I suspect; one would be the fact that the game really does affect us on a personal level (and isn't just a game) and the fact that those who comment on fiction about the game are also writing fiction and thus feel they can do better. Just some thoughts, grain of salt ok?

    Also, I can't say I disagree with you, just maybe not to the same degree. Hence the discussion I was hoping to start.
  • I don't want to burn TonyG in effigy, though we both know lots of folks who'd like to do so. I don't "hate" him for "destroying" a universe I love, although he did it a disservice. I just felt that he let us down in a way I truly don't believe Hjalti will.

    On the other hand, I don't think that either of us approach our reading and criticism purely from the perspective of an EVE player. If I did that, I'd probably more or less like the book, since I did feel like it expanded my understanding of this fictional universe. broadening it in ways I might not have anticipated. Rather, we expect quality because of other material we read. When we choose what we want to read, though, that pretty much defines "bias" in the sense of selecting a sample, so it may be that you have a broader view and thus see a lot of stuff that's worse than this book. :) Personally, I don't really read crummy stuff if I can avoid it, but then that might just make me an elitist snob so I don't attach any sort of valuation to either approach. :p

    Though it strikes me that if liking well-written stuff makes us "mis-calibrated for quality", then maybe the calipers shold get re-adjusted. ;)
  • When I referred to the creative writing class, I did so precisely because those sorts of courses don't teach readability (generally speaking). They teach the crafts of writing and storytelling, and I believe that Gonzales fell down here: not his ability to write coherent English but his technique of telling a tale. And no, I can't easily cite examples when I respond to a comment at work. ;) Once I receive and read The Burning Life, I will post a more thorough review, hopefully contrasting the examples of writing between Hjalti and Gonzales.

    All that aside, I interpreted your first comment as an attack on me as a writer, hence my response. If I did indeed misunderstand and miss your point, I apologize.
  • Stitcher
    speaking as a man who likes to read pretty much anything and everything that'll stand still long enough, EA is FAR from being the worst book I've ever read.

    I'd say it's about average, to be entirely honest. EVE players just tend to be fairly jaded. We expect quality in all things and when it's not delivered, we tend to overreact. We're mis-calibrated for quality, in other words.

    The problem EA suffers from is that it falls inside that band of writing where it's merely "not good", but doesn't fall low enough to become entertaingly bad.

    of course, I've said this several times by now and people still think I'm completely wrong, so maybe I should read it again in a more skeptical frame of mind. Then I can come back and burn TonyG in effigy along with the rest of yez.
  • wwwvenomsbitecom
    Well, you do understand readability, that's good. I haven't actually confused readability with good writing, you made a comment that good writing should be at a much higher level and that this book did not do that. You might be confusing readability with good writing. You made the reference, I was simply showing the obvious.

    "the writing itself struck me as about on the level of a university freshman creative writing class."

    I'm sorry you missed my point, maybe you should re-read the comment. Is there a possibility that you made these wide reaching comments about a book yet you can't cite examples in a discussion about "good writing"? Or is it possible that this discussion isn't want you had in mind with "like-minded players"? I took your post as the introduction to an intelligent conversation on writing, my apologies for mis-reading it.
  • Simpler sentence structures and word choices influence readability. Writers are trained to communicate in a coherent, understandable fashion. You have unfortunately confused readability with good writing: novel structure, character definition, and nuanced storytelling have nothing to do with what you reference. In other words, please don't misuse analytical tools in support of a predetermined conclusion you want to push.

    I read a lot. A great deal of that material comes from genre fiction (science fiction of all stripes, thrillers, etc.) but also technical material (computer science, mathematics, security, political science) related to my work and interests. Novels like this one -- based on a licensed property -- do not receive the same level of editing and other support in the publishing industry and don't spring from the mind of someone who's lovingly created a fictional world and poured themselves into it. That doesn't mean just CCP: most novels based on video games and, in many cases, movies, have the same issues. Star Wars and Star Trek novels, with only a few truly stellar exceptions, read like similar dreck as well. So it shouldn't seem like some huge revelation when educated readers say, "this game novel really sucks".

    Also, I write this blog for my own personal enjoyment and discussion with like-minded players. My professional (non-fiction, technical) writing reads considerably differently, as I have different objectives, resources, and audiences. If you think that a tiny little game blog and a mass-published novel should read the same, I'd like to know what boosters you take.
  • wwwvenomsbitecom
    I'm with Manasi, why the negativity. I suspect it's because even if we do not want to admit it, EVE and playing EVE is personal. Everyone is fond of saying it's just a game but it's social and I think on a mental level so much more. Hence the negativity. So, I just answer my own questions. Hate it when I do that. My real comment was; Cassiella, can you do me the favor of citing some examples of the "bad writing" you are pointing to but do not actually cite?

    Why doesn't telepathy belong in a post-humanist world?
    On your comment about the writing level, are most books not better written at a grade level around the High School level?
    On "breathless superlatives", are you referring to examples such as "most beautiful" and "more complete"? Educate me.

    I'm sorry the book caused you "pain", that is most unfortunate. :) I try to improve my writing and I know I lack, so I would really like to see some examples to back what you are saying. My goal would be to avoid the same "plot holes".

    Oh and I found the book to be difficult to read in parts but I was also reading it while on a long international flight, it was like methadone to for my EVE addiction in those nine hours.

    BTW, this post is easily understandable by 13-15-year-old students. That is by the Flesch Reading Ease scale, which is considered to be where most writing should be as to not lose the reader. On two other scales this post hits a grade level 6 and 7, both also around the 15-year-old level of a reader. :) Just saying. This is also consistent with almost all of your writing.
  • I've been reading a lot of older sci-fi novals recently (Robert A. Heinlein, Ursula Le Guin, Arthur C Clarke) so to pick this up and read it inbetween was perhaps not a good idea. It doesn't stand alone very well. Once I got into it I did enjoy it but I think more so because of its familiarity with regards to Eve and also Faction War (I'm a FW pilot so it was great to read about how things all kicked off) rather than because of its style and content. I did enjoy how the whole thing sped up and got increasingly intense toward the end.
  • I actually enjoyed the book. I even managed to get some friends to buy a copy too :)
  • planetarygenocide
    Personally, I'm a shallow sort of person and thus don't really judge book characters well enough, so I actually found the book quite interesting... at least in terms of general plot on a universe-wide scale. I didn't care much for the subplots about Falek Grange, the Retford, or any of the other "non-important" characters... perhaps that's why I didn't register anything about them, since I just glossed over those bits.

    But hey, that's just me. Lol
  • I have to agree with you here. Just because EVE Online is a sandbox does NOT mean that their published "canon" fiction should be of the same caliber. :P
  • norsechiild
    I guess my point of view is skewed, 95% of my reading to to my 4 & 2 y/o kids so anything with more plot than a Mr Men book is a bonus (this just about does it).
  • rixxjavix
    Bummer. Oh well, now I won't have to read it for myself.
  • lacrimae
    Afaik TonyG has written 2 novellas and like one chronicle. Most of the "new" (i.e. not the first pure infodrop "articles") chrons are by CCP Abraxas (though not the newest ones, seems they have more people writing now)
  • TonyG should stick with doing what he does well: Writing chronicles. I am looking forward to The Burning Life however, as the reading at Fanfest left me with a positive first impression.
  • "Not bad" and "about on par with most game based books"? That's a contradiction if I ever saw one :p ;)
  • Like I said in the post, I wanted the book to be good. But I don't understand the question of just enjoying a book "for being a book". Quality matters, and yeah, I think Gonzales did a terrible job with this one. Maybe he's an outstanding example as a husband and father, for all I know, and maybe he's a great "Intellectual Property Development Manager" (his official title) at CCP.

    But that doesn't mean that everything put on a written page gets a pass for trying hard or being a nice guy. This is the real world.
  • Every writer sucks at first. I don't doubt that Hemingway's first childish scribblings would make us giggle. (I'm not a literature expert, so if it turns out he was actually a child prodigy, please correct me!) Lord knows I still suck, though when I read older pieces, I like to think that I've learned from some of my mistakes and improved in areas where I know I had major problems.

    But the time to work out the worst offenses is before you have a published novel, particularly when you've written two SF novellas before. Theodicy received similar criticism, so improve! Get better! Listen to the folks (like us) who want these books and stories to rock.
  • I'm not (solely) talking about quality of grammar & usage, though I'd tell a lie if I said I didn't notice those things. Instead, I'd like to see characters with nuance, storylines with internal consistency (i.e. that make sense), and themes that fit the universe.
  • norsechiild
    I've got about 10 pages to go and think its okay, not the best book I've ever read but not bad. About on a par with most game based books I've read I'd say, kinda like a Sunday afternoon film on TV.
    Got to agree on the telepathy though, that's annoying.
  • Forgive me while I take a small tangent here but why all the negativity? Surely, I am not an excellent writer, but can't a book just be enjoyed for being a book? Why skewer the guy who wrote it? I do not understand why some feel it necessary to tear down someone's work. Any work can stand improvement, mine as well as anyone's. Just my 2 cents here.
  • I thought I was the only one who saw the writing as rather, parochial. For a first effort in writing a novel, I can't say many bad things. When you are a writer, it's okay to suck (Thank you Mur Lafferty). You have to suck and write and suck and write and eventually you will get better.

    Yeah, it was not a great book but I read it anyway. It was nice to gain some more ambiance of New Eden, but the depth of the characters was still missed a bit. If you can manage to get through the whole thing, consider yourself a patient person who has accomplished something. Ask for a medal in your corporation, the Order of Endurance of the Slaughtered Written Word.

    :P
  • Ibridi
    Hmmmm, damn I was in page 56... Still gonna try to finish reading it though... eventually.
  • rantuket
    I felt the same way when I finished the book. Some parts were really well done and reminded me a well crafted chronicle but for the most part it was a shambles.

    CCP tried to do something that supported in house talent but the guy was not a novelist by any stretch of the imagination, shame but I am still looking forward to the next book being released.
  • seismicstan
    It was the first sci-fi novel that I'd read in a while, but I have to say I quite enjoyed it. However I'm not enough of an expert on EVE lore to know how much Gonzales trampled on the canon. Also, I've still not got my head around the whole 'passive voice' thing so I suppose I'm not much of an authority on the use of language either.
  • I really like Hjalti's chronicles and so I expect I'll enjoy it. I also understand, however, that not everybody likes his style, so I expect that the novel will create sort of a love-it-or-hate-it reaction.
  • My rule of thumb about books is, the author better grab me in the first 4-5 pages if he or she wants to keep me reading. Even giving it the benefit of the doubt, I could not get past the first chapter of Empyrean Age due to poor writing and apparent lack of editing. I'm not particularly hopeful for The Burning Life either, if the author's stunningly awful synopsis that I read quite a while ago is any indication.
blog comments powered by Disqus